Showing posts with label DC Trust. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DC Trust. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 21, 2016

DCAYA's Top Ten Blog Posts of 2016

To wrap up the year, we thought we'd take a look back at our Top Ten most read blogs for 2016, beginning at number 10!!

10) FY2017 Budget Asks, 3/31/16

As you know, our asks take a look at the Mayor's proposed budget, incorporate our own policy analysis and research, and are a mix of requests:
  • to maintain what is in the Mayor's budget,
  • to increase the amount of funding to appropriate levels, and at times
  • to insert funding that isn't included at all.
Our asks for the current fiscal year included Transportation Support, Educational Data Capacity, Youth Workforce Development, Youth Homelessness, and Expanded Learning. Little would we know that the latter ask, as it related to allocation to the DC Trust, would be part of a completely new landscape the following month.

9) Local Funding for Local Opportunity: The Role & Vision of the DC Trust in Expanded Learning, 3/9/16

9 months later, it's pretty interesting to see how the core values shared in this post continue to be a part of the conversation, as legislation for an Office of Youth Outcomes and Grants is in the midst of the markup process, following the dissolution of the DC Trust.. From our community providers, several themes that emerged were:
  • The impact of expanded learning programs on achievement outcomes
  • The capacity of community partnerships to maximize resources
  • The need for stable local funding intermediaries
So although the landscape might be a different one, as our community and representatives finalize what a new youth development entity looks like, the direction and purpose of our work remains constant.

8) A transcript of the Kojo Nnamdi Show's segment on the DC Trust, 5/4/16

Our next most read blog was simply a transcript of a Kojo Nnamdi Show segment focused on the DC Trust, what went wrong and what's next. One of his guests included Andria Tobin, Executive Director of Kid Power Inc, but also a member of DCAYA's Board of Directors. On one our favorite quotes from the show, from Andria:
"So we want to make sure that there’s a really thought out plan to make sure those funds are protected for many nonprofits and youth in the District, one that is collaborative and strategic, and is flexible and innovative in the way that the Trust was designed to be."
7) Lights On Afterschool: 4 Questions with DC Afterschool Ambassador Daniela Grigioni, 10/19/16

This month's blog took a closer look at afterschool, in an interview with Daniela Grigioni, who had been selected as one of 15 leaders from across the nation to serve as a 2016-2017 Afterschool Ambassador for the Afterschool Alliance. This is the third of our blogs in the top ten which related to Expanded Learning. This is one of our four main issue areas, and has to do with learning outside of the classroom, particularly after the school day and over the summer.

6) Homeless Youth Census: Data-Driven Advocacy Calls for Greater Investment to End Youth Homelessness, 3/2/16

As with many of our efforts, the need for accurate, robust, and timely data leads to better advocacy. And the Homeless Youth Census is both a great example and a relatively recent success. Benefits of this census highlighted in the 2015 Report Fact Sheet were that it:

  • Provides understanding of the number of youth experiencing homelessness in the District
  • Informs the various and complex needs of youth experiencing homelessness and help bring solutions to scale
  • Educates key stakeholders of where resources should be allocated
What's especially wonderful looking back at this post was another very recent success we highlighted in last week's blog post, that the DC Interagency Council on Homelessness voted to approve the 5-year Comprehensive Plan to end youth homelessness.


It should be no surprise that one of our most read blog posts was an update regarding the hearing schedule set by DC Council, which is our primary advocacy season. We've already been planning for the FY2017 hearings over the past several months, which included our regular community input sessions across our four issue areas as well as a special effort to move the Office of Youth Outcomes and Grants legislation forward so that an FY2018 budget has somewhere to put Out-of-School Time funding.


This month, we re-released #ExpandLearningDC, our policy and funding framework for afterschool and summer learning in DC, originally posted in April. The report had been updated following the vote that month by the DC Trust’s Board of Directors to dissolve the organization. This version also used updated data to better reflect trends in out-of-school time access within DCPS.

3) #ExpandLearningDC, 1/28/16

Even more read than the previous blog post, was our first Expanded Learning post of the year. As you can tell from this year's highlights, our work is definitely more of a marathon rather than a sprint. Although our main advocacy season happens during regular times each year, not only is there a tremendous amount of work that is required to prepare for and then evaluate after hearings, but there are also the unplanned events and developments that we have to monitor and respond to, like the dissolution of the DC Trust. And this refers not just to DCAYA's staff of four, but the hundreds of member organizations whom we do our work with.

2) Leading the Way in Youth Workforce Development!, 8/3/16

The runner-up to our top read blog post for 2016 was our recap of a joint program we have with the Institute for Educational Leadership, the Youth Workforce Leaders Academy aka YWLA. Through in-person learning sessions with national and local experts, online discussions, capstone projects, individual professional development action planning, and facilitated peer-to-peer learning, participants will significantly expanded and grew their expertise in providing high quality youth workforce development services This post recapped the year with our 2nd cadre, and recognized each individual in this post.

1) New Year, New Resolutions, 1/6/16

Our most read post was our first one of 2016, a light-hearted start to the year, using GIFs to animate some New Year's Resolutions we wanted to make, both personally and professionally.

And THAT was 2016! We hope you enjoyed this look down memory lane, as we look ahead to 2017. We also hope you may have learned a bit more, not just about our work highlighted at various points throughout the year, but how it all ties together. And this work is only possible, because of the year-round engagement of our members and support from our community.

If you would like to support us during this holiday season, please consider showing your support with a donation, and thank you in advance!

- Your DCAYA Team

Wednesday, November 02, 2016

The Future of Youth Development Programming- Testimony from Maggie Riden

Bill 21-865 is the Office on Youth Outcomes and Grants Establishment Act of 2016. This past Monday,
Maggie Riden, our Executive Director, and numerous other community members were at the Council of the District of Columbia. The Committee on Education held a public hearing on the Bill. Here is the testimony Maggie provided:

***

Thank you, Chairperson Grosso, members of the Committee on Education, and staff. My name is Maggie Riden, and I am here today on behalf of my organization, the DC Alliance of Youth Advocates, a coalition of over 130 youth-serving organizations in the District. I want to start by thanking you, Chairperson Grosso, and your colleague Councilmember Nadeau for putting forward this legislative proposal. Since the DC Trust announced its dissolution six months ago, we have come a long way in a short time. We applaud the leadership of this Council in prioritizing a strong path forward for funding youth development in the District, as well as the leadership of the Deputy Mayors for Education and Health and Human Services for acting with urgency to ensure continuity of funding in FY2017, and to begin envisioning a path forward informed by best practices in other jurisdictions.

To support these efforts, DCAYA has provided historic local context on the history of this system and current challenges; as well as summarized and provided extensive research and analysis on emerging/best practice in designing youth development systems. In addition, we have also been active in collecting feedback from community-based expanded learning partners, which provide youth development services across the District to more than 8,000 children and youth. Since April, we have had numerous phone conversations and one-on- one meetings with providers, local funders and youth development experts, and have also held four well-attended member meetings on this issue. DCAYA strongly believes that the best solutions to policy and systems challenges comes from a combination of local and national research and analysis, examination of best practice, consideration of local context and robust stakeholder input. I just want to underscore that to the best extent possible, these different inputs and considerations inform our testimony today.

Thursday, June 09, 2016

It's Time to #ExpandLearningDC! (version 2.0)

This week, DCAYA is pleased to re-release #ExpandLearningDCour policy and funding framework for afterschool and summer learning in DC, which we originally posted here in April. The report has since been updated following a vote that month by the DC Trust’s Board of Directors to dissolve the organization. This version also uses updated data to better reflect trends in out-of-school time access within DCPS.

Read the full report and our recommendations:
#ExpandLearningDC Framework

Don't have time for the full report? Check out our executive summary and quality checklist. We've developed the checklist tool to help education leaders, policy makers, funders and parents determine universal out-of-school time (OST) quality standards for provider programs and the District-wide system as a whole.

Report Appendices: We've also prepared resources on DCPS elementary and middle schools and expanded learning outcomes to reference in your advocacy, as well as fact sheets for afterschool enrollment in Title I elementary and middle schools in each Ward!*

                             Ward 1 Fact Sheet                     Ward 6 Fact Sheet
                             Ward 2 Fact Sheet                     Ward 7 Fact Sheet
                             Ward 4 Fact Sheet                     Ward 8 Fact Sheet
                             Ward 5 Fact Sheet

CURRENT TRENDS
  • Local funding for community-based out-of-school time programs has declined by 60% since 2010. This has resulted in only a quarter of the locally-funded slots for community-based afterschool and summer learning that were there for kids just six years ago, from close to 10,000 in 2010 to under 2,500 in 2016.
  • DCPS schools with the highest “at-risk” student enrollment also tend to have the lowest share of available afterschool enrollment slots through OSTP. While all young people benefit from these opportunities, kids who are considered “at-risk” stand to gain the most from participating in afterschool. The present trend in funding to schools gives reason to be optimistic, but overall need in the District persists.

RECOMMENDATIONS

If we are serious about providing safe, youth-friendly opportunities focused on improving outcomes and quality of life for all our children now and in future, we must reverse these trends. To do so on the scale that is needed, policy makers, funders, intermediaries and educational leaders must embrace an approach that fully integrates expanded learning into our public education continuum.

Please read the report to find out more about these trends and DCAYA's 8 recommendations exploring what it will take for more expanded learning opportunities to reach the many thousands of children and youth in the District who stand to benefit from them!

(* Please note, we did not prepare a fact sheet for Ward 3 because there are no Title I DCPS schools in the Ward, however Ward 3 elementary and middle schools and their at-risk enrollment are included in our DCPS schools appendix.)

Joseph Gavrilovich is DCAYA's senior policy analyst for expanded learning. If you have any questions about today's blog, or would like more information on our afterschool and summer learning advocacy please contact him at joseph@dc-aya.org

You can also reach out to him to obtain an archived copy of the earlier version of the #ExpandLearningDC report.

Wednesday, June 01, 2016

DCAYA’s Budget Updates Part II: Expanded Learning & Youth Homelessness

The final vote by the Council occurred yesterday, and the District’s FY17 budget now goes to Mayor Bowser. Today we continue to reflect on the work of our members and partners throughout this year’s advocacy season, and provide an update on successes for youth, families and children within the FY17 budget. Last week’s blog focused on Youth Workforce Development and Disconnected Youth, and we continue this week with a look at Expanded Learning and Youth Homelessness.

Expanded Learning

A Path Forward for Funding Afterschool and Summer Learning

After the mayor proposed $4.9 million to the DC Trust for community-based afterschool and summer programming in FY17, our initial ask was to double that investment in order to serve up to four times as many children and youth in need of quality expanded learning opportunities. While we were optimistic about the strength of the proposed amount compared to recent years, it was not enough to reverse a downward trend for out-of-school time programming we have seen each year in the District since 2010.

While we will continue to advocate for scaled-up, multi-year funding beginning in FY18, the advocacy priority for FY17 quickly shifted with the announced dissolution of the DC Trust on April 26. Since then, DCAYA and our community-based partners have worked hard to preserve the $4.9 million intended for expanded learning programs. Our coalition has held more than a dozen meetings with members of DC Council and their staff, as well as the Deputy Mayors for Education and Health and Human Services, to build support among policy makers for an established, nonprofit intermediary with youth development expertise to administer out-of-school time (OST) funding in FY17. We continue to be an active partner in this effort, as Deputy Mayor Brenda Donald presents this recommendation to Mayor Bowser.

We’d like to thank the Deputy Mayors and members of Council, as well as all of our expanded learning partners (simply too many to list here) who stepped up to provide resources and insight in the wake of the Trust’s collapse. Most especially, we’re grateful to those members who met with policy makers and offered public testimony to advocate for the preservation of out-of-school time funding. We'd like to give a special shout out of thanks to Fair Chance and Gretchen Van der Veer for helping coordinate our members and Fair Chance partners to do a final round of walk arounds with DC Council on the importance of out of school time programming.


Sustaining 21st Century Community Learning Centers

Earlier this year, the Office of the State Superintendent of Education (OSSE) announced that due to internal efforts to streamline grant making processes and decreased federal funds, there would be no new competition for the federal 21st Century Community Learning Center (CLC) grant program in the 2016-2017 school year. This action immediately affected three community-based OST providers who all stood to lose approximately $995,413 in the coming school year. The disruption of these services, which have all demonstrated quality programming and remarkable outcomes for students, would have caused significant ramifications next year for up to 1,000 at-risk students and undermined years of investments.

Recognizing that families, youth and children deserve more than a haphazard and inconsistent delivery of these key critical services, DCAYA and these three partners launched a targeted advocacy effort to find support and funding. These efforts paid off with Council identifying $800,000 to sustain 21st Century CLC’s in FY17. We’d like to thank these organizations and their families for rallying to support the students, as well as Superintendent Hanseul Kang and everyone at OSSE for their support in working toward a solution, and Councilmembers David Grosso, Brianne Nadeau and Charles Allen for their outspoken support for sustaining this important and life-changing funding stream.

Youth Homelessness

Building Capacity for a Youth-Friendly System

This year, DCAYA advocated to an additional investment of $800,000 to create more transitional housing and independent living options for youth experiencing homelessness. While the mayor’s proposed budget included significantly more funding for crisis support and prevention and diversion services, which we had advocated for and certainly applaud, more funding for meaningful housing interventions will be needed in future years if we are to meet the intent of the 2014 End Youth Homelessness Amendment Act and make homelessness among unaccompanied minors and transition-aged youth rare, brief and non-recurring by 2020.

DCAYA continues to work in a leadership role with the Interagency Council of Homelessness (ICH) and the ICH Youth Subcommittee, and we are optimistic that with the Fall release of the ICH’s Strategic Plan to End Youth Homelessness, we and our partners will be positioned to make an even stronger ask next budget season. We’d like to thank ICH Executive Director Kristy Greenwalt, DHS Director Laura Zeilinger, and DHS Deputy Administrator for Youth Services Hilary Cairns for their continued leadership and support for scaled-up funding, as well as Kimberly Henderson with Child and Family Services Agency, for her role co-chairing the Youth Subcommittee. We are grateful to our members and partners from Sasha Bruce, Casa Ruby, the Latin American Youth Center, Wanda Alston, Covenant House and the DC Center for the LGBT Community for their leadership, advocacy partnerships and public testimonies.

Dignified Housing for Homeless Children & Families

In February, the mayor made good on her promise to voters to deliver a plan to close D.C. General and move homeless families into safe and dignified housing throughout the District, and the plan was met both with intense support and praise, and resistance and criticism. The months that followed saw some of this teased out as policy makers, advocates, and members of the community worked toward a middle ground.  We are pleased that Council has since passed a revised plan that calls for the use of government-owned properties in Wards 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8, and the purchase (instead of leasing) of the sites in Wards 1 and 4. These revisions effectively respond to resident concerns about cost while maintaining the overall intent of the plan. We believe that the housing these families will receive, along with improved access to local amenities and on-site case management services, will have life-changing results for their children well worth this effort and its capital expenditures.

For more on youth issues in DC you can FOLLOW us on Twitter, LIKE us on Facebook, SUBSCRIBE to this blog and VISIT us at www.dc-aya.org.

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

What is the Path Forward for Supporting Afterschool and Summer Programs for Youth?


In case you missed it, Senior Policy Analyst Joseph Gavrilovich was a guest blogger for the DC Fiscal Policy Institute (DCFPI) earlier this week:
The DC Council should act this budget season to ensure resources will be available for afterschool and summer programs for low-income students, following the recent news that the DC Trust will be dissolved due to financial mismanagement and other problems. For over a decade, the Trust has served to distribute funds from DC government for these important programs run by community-based organizations. 
The collapse of the Trust raises a question that affects the lives of thousands of DC kids: Without the DC Trust, what is the path forward for funding youth development in the District? For the coming year, a short-term solution makes sense. A group of youth-serving organizations recommends allowing a local foundation to allocate the $4.9 million in the Mayor’s fiscal year (FY) 2017 budget for community-based afterschool and summer programming. This will give the Mayor and DC Council a year to work with community stakeholders to develop a permanent solution.
To read the rest of his blog, please visit DCFPI's site

Wednesday, May 04, 2016

A transcript of the Kojo Nnamdi Show's segment on the DC Trust

Yesterday, the Kojo Nnamdi Show had a segment discussing the DC Trust, D.C.’s 17-Year-Old Charitable Trust Bankrupts.

His guests included Aaron Davis, a reporter at The Washington Post, Brenda Donald, the Deputy Mayor for Health and Human Services in the District of Columbia, and our own Andria Tobin, Executive Director of Kid Power Inc. as well as Member of our Board of Directors.

Today's blog post is simply a transcript of the segment, which you can listen to at the links above, as well. Please let us know what you think with a comment!


Kojo: Established in the late nineties by then Mayor Anthony Williams to leverage public funds to raise private dollars for youth services, the DC Trust has, at its best, done that. But, at its worst, it has been plagued by scandal. And now it’s heading for dissolution, as the accounts are bare. Here to explain what’s going on is Brenda Donald. She is the Deputy Mayor for Health and Human Services in the District of Columbia. Brenda Donald, thank you for joining us.

Brenda: Thank you, Kojo, for having me.

Kojo: In an ideal scenario, when things are working properly, what’s the role of the DC Trust in relation to the District government and to the citizens of the District?

Brenda: Well the Trust was envisioned as an intermediary organization that would be a partner to the District government, would help to leverage and raise private funds and then support the work of nonprofit organizations who were focused on youth development, afterschool programming, and that sort of thing.

Kojo: What is meant by “raise” and “leverage” funds?

Brenda: Right. Well, I was with the organization DC Agenda, that is no longer in existence, that helped to start the Trust, working with then Mayor Williams. And at that time, if you will recall, the city was under a receivership, and there was not a lot of confidence by corporations or foundations in giving money to the District government. And so the Trust was seen as a safe place, a credible organization that could raise private dollars. And then the city could also contribute funds, so that there was more money that would go to programs that nonprofit organizations could run.

Kojo: Just so I fully understand how that worked, if the city puts money into the Trust, can the city then go to private organizations or private individuals and say “Look, we have committed to this Trust, we know the nonprofits that will be able to help kids under this Trust, so if you’re looking around for some place to put money, if you’re looking to help kids in the District, this is where to put it.” Is that what is meant by “leveraging” funds?

Brenda: Yes, I think that’s a really good way of describing it. But not just the city would be able to raise money, but the Trust itself was expected to be able to knock on some doors and say, “Wow, we’ve got this wonderful organization, we have a partnership with city government, and we think that this is a good place to invest in, to support the work of community based organizations.”

Kojo: Also joining us in studio is Aaron Davis, he’s a reporter for the Washington Post covering DC Politics and government accountability. Aaron, good to see you.

Aaron: Thanks for having me.

Kojo: The promise of the Trust aside, it has been plagued by scandal, most notably perhaps, the former Councilmember Harry Thomas. To what end did he use the Trust, remind us?

Aaron: Well, this is back as he took office in 2007, 2008. He was kind of diverting some of the funds that were supposed to go to a baseball program, and ended up using that pretty much straight for personal gain, purchase of an SUV, of a motorcycle, of travel. I think there was a fancy pair of shoes in there, something. He received a thirty-eight month federal prison sentence for that. I think what the Deputy Mayor described is exactly how this whole thing was supposed to work. The problem is it really has never quite worked that well. Or if it has, it’s been for brief spurts and there’s been so many ways for this to go wrong. The nonprofit itself...think of it like a Rorschach test, everything you think about DC, like with the problems with the Council, the problems with the Mayor, the problems with the murky way things are funded, you can find enough blame here to go around, there wasn’t good oversight a lot of times, there wasn’t a clear direction from the Mayor of how this should be used, it was shifting. And now we’re learning that the audits of this done by outside auditors, and the way that this fund was being used, really wasn’t how we thought.

Kojo: The Thomas case wasn’t the only sign of trouble. There was a Congressional investigation in 2013, was there not? Did that lead to additional oversight?

Aaron: Well that led to a big part of the Trust work being offloaded. So this was all the DC Opportunity Scholarship money that came in for vouchers, and the DC Trust did administer that. And they said it was doing a poor job of managing that money, seeing where it was going; too many students going into one school and money being used to prop up one of these schools. And so they did move the Opportunity Scholarship fund out of that. You could say that part of what we’re seeing now, the end of the Trust, you can trace it to Harry Thomas Jr. and the fact that nobody really from the outside wanted to put money into the Trust after that. They weren’t sure it was really going to be used the way they thought it was going to be, and also the loss of the Opportunity Scholarship money. You could see that there were some underlying problems in the finances, there was a lot less money to go around, there was twenty million dollars flowing through this Trust during that Opportunity Scholarship period.

Kojo: And what does this mean to the nonprofits who are the ones who are in direct contact with the at-risk children who are supposed to be benefitting from this? Joining us in studio is Andria Tobin. She is the Executive Director of Kid Power. She also currently serves on the board of directors for the DC Alliance of Youth Advocates.Thank you for joining us.

Andria: Thank you for having me.

Kojo: Your organization is one of a number that will be affected by this. Tell us, exactly, what Kid Power Incorporated does.

Andria: Kid Power is a nonprofit here in the District. We’ve been serving DC youth for approximately fourteen years. We provide afterschool and summer programming to about four hundred and twenty-five students.

Kojo: What kind of afterschool and summer programming?

Andria: Our focus is on academics, health & wellness, and civic engagement, really focused on leadership. So giving young people the tools that they need to become informed, engaged advocates for change in their own lives and in their communities. So as we know, young people face tremendous obstacles here in the city, and we think it’s not just important for us to address those immediate, but give our young people a sense of agency to help create a stronger District.

Kojo: How will what’s going on affect your organization and what value do you think would be lost if the kind of work you do goes unfunded?

Andria: I think there’s short term, medium term, and long term effects that this will have. I think most nonprofits and current grantees funded by the Trust are most concerned about current grant commitments. So we are one of many grantees still awaiting payment on services already rendered for young people in the District. We have been reassured by the Trust and by city Council that those funds will be paid out. But there’s a lot of concern for the allocation for FY17, which was to go to the Trust. The nonprofit community was getting ready to make a push for more funds, and now we’re worried about protecting what was allocated. So we want to make sure that there’s a really thought out plan to make sure those funds are protected for many nonprofits and youth in the District, one that is collaborative and strategic, and is flexible and innovative in the way that the Trust was designed to be.

Kojo: If you have questions or comments give us a call at 800-433-8850. Have you done business with the DC Trust in the past? Tell us about your experience, 800-433-8850. You can send email to “kojo@wamu.org”. You can send us a tweet at “kojoshow” or go to our website, “kojoshow.org”. Ask a question or make a comment there. Brenda Donald, you are on the Trust board. When did you first have a sense that the bottom was falling out of this thing, that bankruptcy was imminent? Was there any discussion among you and your fellow board members about how to try to stop it, or is letting it dissolve and starting over the better option, as you saw it?

Brenda: A number of things unfolded over the past few months, and I do serve in an Ex Officio capacity on the board. When I came in as Deputy Mayor under Mayor Bowser, I started taking a closer look at the Trust and the city’s partnership with the Trust, and how we manage our oversight and the cost for administering funds. And so we were already looking at restructuring some of that, in terms of some of our program areas. But there were a lot of things that came to light when the former Executive Director resigned. And we then hired an independent accounting firm to come in and do a forensic accounting of the books. A new Interim Director came in and really started looking at operational costs. But I think the most important thing, to go to Andria’s point and to Aaron’s point, is really our focus going forward. First, I want to clarify when people say “the programs funded by the Trust”. Well, the programs are really funded by the city. And the reality is-

Kojo: Through the Trust.

Brenda: Through the Trust. And so the commitment of the Bowser administration is that we will honor all commitments to existing grantees. In fact, we even asked the Trust to administer funding for the summer programs, and that process is underway. We will do that for the rest of the fiscal year sixteen, which goes through September thirtieth. We are working with the Trust to have a small core team of staff that stays on board, so that we can responsibly complete the commitments for this year. Mayor Bowser has in her budget 4.9 million dollars for Trust programs for Out-of-School Time and summer programs, for the first time all put in to the budget at the beginning of the year. And I and the rest of the administration are advocating for those funds to continue. The other thing is that we’ll be working this summer, really over the next couple of months, with stakeholders, providers, and advocates to come up with the best strategy for going forward. And, as Andria mentioned, it will be strategic, it will be collaborative. And I think we will find a better way forward, and certainly the city will do its due diligence in terms of what we want, what we’re investing our money in, in terms of accountability and oversight.

Kojo: Well frankly, despite all the talk about going forward, some of us are concerned about why we’re not looking back, to see exactly what happened here. Colbert King in the Washington Post Op-ed this past weekend raised that issue. Aaron, many hoped or thought that the group had weathered the storm. But now that we learned that the Trust is essentially out of money, what’s your understanding of that happened and who the heck is responsible?

Aaron: Well, I think you do look at how this has been funded. So the expectation was always that some of the money would come from the outside and some of it would come from the city. And really, since Harry Thomas, the city’s had to fund almost all of it. And they’ve never really put the amount of money up front, in any given year, to do so. And so there’s been little bits of money, as the city finds a little extra here or there, there’s been a little bit pushed over to the Trust. And this has happened to the tune of several millions of dollars a year. And so you don’t have a lot of direction of how this money is supposed to be spent. And that’s a question the past administration is going to have to answer for a little bit. I also think that the Council oversight...I’ve gone back and looked at last year’s hearing and some of these issues were raised a year ago in front of the Council. I think Andria can tell you, because she’s been to more of these hearings than I have been, but these are not new issues to anybody looking closely at it. And so there is some fault with the Council. There is some fault with the Administration. There also is...obviously it’s Ed Davies who’s the former Executive Director, who’s now gone, and Earl Hamilton, the former CFO. So Ed resigned in January, was moving on to a different job and the day he’s leaving, the board finds this personal loan on the books to him. And start looking at this, and there were expenses he put for an airline ticket, for travel. Things had been done with the organization credit card. That kind of stuff that was happening, they’d been paying tens of thousands of dollars a month for their lease on-

Kojo: Twenty-six thousand dollars a month?

Aaron: Yeah. And so there were a lot of ways they could’ve been saving money that they weren’t. And so, was the board really taking a critical look? Were they privy to this information? Was the Executive Director more empowered than he should’ve been? There’s a lot of questions still, to be honest.

Kojo: Frankly, Harry Thomas Jr. may have been the canary in the coal mine. Andria, when and how did you learn about the Trust’s plan to essentially declare bankruptcy? Or did you hear the rumblings before?

Andria: I think I speak for a lot of people that we were surprised in the immediacy, but then in general not surprised. These issues have been raised year after year. I can remember sitting with Jim Graham who, year after year, brought up rent, who brought up certain appointees to the board that maybe shouldn’t have been there. These issues have been going on for a long time. But unfortunately, we did find out right away by the Post. And I think the Trust scrambled to get the message out, more thought out, and I think they did a good job of at least doing that. But these issues have been going on for a long time and, like Aaron said, I don’t think you can put the blame on any one thing. But we can look back and see some structural issues. We can look at other cities, other best practices, to find a way that the government can continue to support its young people through an intermediary that, perhaps, doesn’t open itself to some of these issues with being non-transparent and having some undue influence.

Kojo: Got to take a short break. When we come back, we’ll continue this conversation. If you’ve called, stay on the line, If you’d like to, the number is 800-433-8850. Do you think the District should completely rethink the way it administers funding for programs for at-risk kids? 800-433-8850. What kind of model would you look to? You can send us a tweet at “kojoshow” or email at “kojo@wamu.org”. I’m Kojo Nnamdi.

---

Kojo: Welcome back. We’re talking about the DC Trust, which provides funds for nonprofits that help at-risk kids in the District. We’re talking with Brenda Donald, Deputy Mayor for Health and Human Services in the District of Columbia; Andria Tobin, who’s the Executive Director of Kid Power Incorporated, she also currently serves on the board of directors of the DC Alliance of Youth Advocates; and Aaron Davis, he’s a reporter for the Washington Post, covering DC politics and government accountability. We have not mentioned the DC Alliance of Youth Advocates, what does that do?

Andria: It’s a member coalition serving over a hundred and fifty nonprofits in the District, working to support best practices and policies for a youth-friendly DC, around the issues of expanded learning, out-of-school time, youth homelessness, and disconnected youth.

Kojo: And Aaron Davis, I was talking earlier about who is going to be held accountable for this. In that regard you have some, what might be, related news.

Aaron: Yeah, we’re going to be break a tiny bit of news for you on the Kojo Show. Ed Davies is no longer gainfully employed, as I understand it, in Chicago. The nonprofit that he went to go work at there, MHA Labs, I had contact with the company yesterday. His bio page was taken down off the-

Kojo: He was the Executive Director of the Trust. He was the Executive Director who used the Trust credit card for personal expenses, and said he, however, repaid those expenses.

Brenda: And Kojo, if I could chime in-

Kojo: Please, Brenda Donald.

Brenda: When we found this out, we immediately requested an investigation by the Inspector General. So there is an investigation underway. We want to make sure that, we’re not the experts in terms of who should be held accountable for anything legally but they are, and they will conduct that investigation.

Kojo: It’s my understanding that just prior, a few days before Aaron’s story ran, the Trust issued requests for proposals for summer funding. Which group, agency, or organization is going to be responsible for overseeing that work, in the short term?

Brenda: Well, as I said earlier, we’ll have a small core team at the Trust that I will be managing that group to administer the summer funds, and to ensure that the completion of the Out-of-School Time grants are done, and the mini-grants and the other ongoing work for this fiscal year.

Kojo: We got a post on our website from Ken who said, “Between the board members from the Mayor’s office, area experts in banking and law and from DC think tanks, should be able to resuscitate a $5 million trust fund, why isn’t this agency in the financial ER getting CPR, when all the best doctors are standing right there next to the platform [sic]?” What’re you trying to put together now?

Brenda: Yeah, I think too little, too late, in terms of the Trust, that structurally their budget was so unbalanced and their inability to raise private dollars and just relying totally on city dollars just made the decision for the board, it was a tough one, but to say we really need to close up shop and look at another way.

Kojo: On to Sarah in Montgomery County, Maryland. Sarah, you’re on the air. Go ahead please.

Sarah: My comment has everything to do with what she just said about an ability to raise private dollars. I’m incredulous that I just heard on the news this morning how many millions of donated dollars these political candidates can raise, yet you can’t get people to donate to help our children, who are our future? Why don’t you just hire one of these people that are raising all this money for these candidates, to raise money for the children? It just boggles my mind that politicians are more important to people’s pocket books than their own children.

Kojo: Well, as far as I know, Brenda Donald has not ever run for office in the District of Columbia-

Brenda: Not my forte.

Kojo: -so she can’t tell you about campaign funds. But Aaron Davis, the caller says “Look, politicians are great at hitting up on people for money for their campaigns. Why can’t they hit up on the same people to help at-risk kids?” The answer is, they probably do.

Aaron: Honestly, I mean this is something I’ll have to pay a lot of close attention to, going forward, because this is the problem you don’t want to have. You don’t want to be in a position where you’re allowing such a fund to be used for political kickbacks for people who do give donors, or people who are friends of the politicians in power. So if all this work is moved inside the Mayor’s office and millions of dollars are being sent out directly by the Mayor’s office, you do have to then put it through that prism and hold all that accountable in that way, as well.

Kojo: Well some criticism has been raised that unfortunately the directors of these programs have been political appointees, rather than people who were put in those positions because of their expertise and financial management or their experience with nonprofits. To which you say what, Andria?

Andria: Well, just speaking for dealing with my own board, every line item is scrutinized that I spend. And so I think our board has to be intentional. Do we need more lawyers? Do we need more consultants? Do we need more educational professionals? So that the board is really meeting the nonprofit’s needs. And unfortunately, if that’s not the case and they’re just appointed without that really intentional process, I think you open up the doors to potential ethical violations.

Kojo: We’ve hosted a lot of conversations about the nonprofit world. We’re a part of it ourselves, here at WAMU. So we know how conscious donors are of questions about overhead and good stewardship practices. As someone who leads a nonprofit, what are your impressions of how the Trust was established and run as a nonprofit?

Andria: I think that how the Trust was set up to be able to leverage public dollars to raise additional private dollars is something that every nonprofit does. We protect the city’s investment as a nonprofit organization by bringing in private dollars. But I think how that’s transpired has led to an unfortunate lack of transparency and possible corruption, which is a real shame. I read in the Post about, and this is something I was unaware of, about travel expenditures and misuse of credit card. And so those monthly statements should be reviewed every month, as far as I’m concerned. We’re a lot smaller, so I field questions like, “Why did we spend a hundred dollars on Survey Monkey?” But I imagine there could’ve been a little more oversight into their finances.

Kojo: Aaron, some think the Trust was set up to fail or allowed to continue to do so under previous administrations. How so and what ultimately do you anticipate will be the way forward on this? We know that in the short term, Brenda Donald’s agency is going to be overseeing this, but what do you see?

Aaron: Well, it’s a good question, and actually Brenda’s the one to ask. She’ll have a lot of power over how that will happen. But probably more of this will get segregated out into different parts of the government. Some of the education money could be put under the Deputy Mayor of Education, some of it may be better spent -- you know there’s a whole package of grants that the Bowser Administration just put out last fall for public safety and at-risk youth, in the wake of the huge homicide spike last year. So who’s the best person to be looking at that money, and who’s the best person to be looking all the afterschool money. And I do think, whatever you do, it should be more continuous and continuity in the funding, because stories of, just for this summer, these programs will have only about a week’s time to figure out, once they get the money, how they can start running the program a week later. And can people pay rent from one year to the next? It’s not clear for a lot of people who are depending on this money from the city.

Kojo: Brenda Donald.

Brenda: I don’t always agree with Aaron but I agree with his assessment here. So this gives us an opportunity to just figure out the best way forward, what makes the most sense, what does the city want in terms of its resources. And to Andria’s earlier point, it’s got to be done with greater accountability and transparency. And we will be doing this with our partners, and we will consider a number of options and then develop a plan to go forward.

Kojo: Brenda Donald is the Deputy Mayor for Health and Human Services in the District of Columbia. Thank you for joining us.

Brenda: Thank you.

Kojo: Aaron Davis is a reporter for the Washington Post, covering DC politics and government accountability. This story is not completely written yet.

Aaron: No, there’s still some more to do. We will be trying to look back and unpack what happened with greater detail. And there’s a series of audits and investigations, and pretty much everybody with investigative authority in DC is looking at this in one way or another, at this point in time. I think you’ll probably have something from the Attorney General, the DC Auditor, the Inspector General. So those are all yet to come. And when we do get a clear picture of how much money was being used on these personal credit cards or for personal expenses, that could drive a lot of the discussion about whether this was just mismanagement or something a bit more sinister.

Kojo: Andria Tobin is the Executive Director of Kid Power Incorporated and serves on the board of directors for the DC Alliance of Youth Advocates.Your work, you think, goes forward.

Andria: Absolutely. We’re confident the city cares about its young people. We know the issues they face, the young people in our city face, are very complicated and complex. And we’re very happy to be part of a collaborative effort to make sure that their holistic needs, academic, social, health, are being met. And we’re confident the city is going to invest in that.

Kojo: Thank you all for joining us.

Wednesday, April 27, 2016

Regarding the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation


This week's blog post is our statement released yesterday in response to the news about the DC Trust dissolving. In light of these events, we will be revising and re-releasing our #ExpandLearningDC report and fact sheets here in the coming weeks (the report was originally released on this blog on April 13). 

In the meantime, as we all work together to find a way forward, DCAYA is recommending that stakeholders use our checklist of standards for quality out-of-school time programs and systems as a shared framework. Our statement from April 26, 2016 follows.

This morning, we learned that the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust Corporation (DC Trust) will be dissolving. While the exact timeline and process is still to be determined or announced, now is the time to move forward on next steps with urgency. We want to provide you with a few immediate updates on what we’ve learned today. This is followed by a more detailed set of recommendations for the path moving forward, and a final reminder of why the programs the Trust has funded remain so vital.

Immediate Updates
Based on conversations with the Council and the Deputy Mayor for Health and Human Services, Brenda Donald, we are confident that:
  • Current out of school time grant commitments will be honored. 
  • The $2,000,000 allocation for this coming summer will remain stable and move quickly (likely through the Trust as a part of the final wind down).
  • Council will work to ensure the Mayor’s proposed $4,900,000 for FY17 is protected. The Mayor has demonstrated a clear commitment to young people with the proposed FY17 budget to fund OST programming. The continuation of the youth development work that was central to the mission of the DC Trust, “ensur(ing) that every DC youth develops the skills to grow into a healthy, caring and productive adult” is paramount.
  • Mayor Bowser will deploy both Deputy Mayor Donald and Deputy Mayor Niles to work closely with Council and the community to develop a transition plan for next school year. DCAYA recommends that funding be directed to a local intermediary organization or funding institution with established grant-making expertise and an understanding of the District’s youth development landscape. Alternatively, funding could reside within a one-time special commission for children and youth that is established for the FY17 school year and summer until a more long-term intermediary is designated. In either scenario, we must work collaboratively to ensure programming is not disrupted next fall. 
Taking a thoughtful approach to the management of youth development funding is critical, and as we work with policy makers, our members, and the community at large to explore and consider next steps and solutions, we must remain aware of the unique space such an intermediary exists in. Because of this, while there might seem to be easier options to consider, such as shifting these funds to Local Education Agencies (LEAs), we would be remiss in our own work if we didn’t push to find a better, sustainable solution rather than rush to institutionalize an easier, short-term one.

While next steps remain a bit unclear today, know that we’re working closely across DC government to ensure that there will be opportunities for public feedback and input on what has and has not worked historically. As these and other opportunities are made available, we will communicate them to you and your fellow DCAYA members.

The Path Forward
We are dedicated to protecting this funding, to ensuring that it will stay intact, and to guaranteeing that it remains true to its original purpose. We have been searching for alternative OST funding structures, even before seeing the news regarding the DC Trust’s dissolution. We believe the value of a public-private intermediary should be central to our thinking about the future of OST and youth development funding. We are committed to being a thought partner in this work, and will frame future conversations with these thoughts in mind:
  1. When effectively designed, intermediaries can have tremendous value. We know how valuable having a grantmaking intermediary for local Out-of-School Time (OST) funding is to our members and community based organizations in general. A strong public-private intermediary professionalizes the non-profit, youth serving sector through the provision of high quality youth development training and technical assistance. It can ensure grantee accountability through consistent oversight; and finally, when effectively designed an intermediary entity can make sure public investments are made to high quality youth development programs with demonstrated impacts on academic achievement, diminishing the learning gap, reducing truancy, combating youth crime, promoting healthy behaviors and supporting transition-aged youth.
  2. The DC Council’s oversight of the intermediary should set a reasonable cap on annual overhead and administrative costs. This action would serve to reassure providers and the public that the funds are dedicated to OST, and that the dollars are reaching the most number of children and youth through community-based program implementation. A threshold of 10-15% would meet the recommendations “reasonable cap” standard.
  3. As longer-term solutions are considered, all stakeholder partners should establish and use a common checklist of quality standards for OST programs and the system as a whole. Any and all funders, programs, schools, parent-teacher organizations, government leaders, LEAs and agency partners would have access to the tool. Any CBOs receiving OST grants from the funding intermediary would be expected to meet the quality standards. Similarly, all policy and funding decisions impacting OST would be assessed according to this checklist.
The Value of Out of School Time Opportunities

The annual share of funding for out-of-school time programs has declined by 60% since 2010. As a result, only one quarter of the locally-funded slots exist now for community-based afterschool and summer learning that were available to kids just six years ago, a reduction from close to 10,000 in 2010 to fewer than 2,500 in 2016.

If we are serious about providing safe, youth-friendly opportunities focused on improving outcomes and quality of life for all our children now and in future, we must protect the $4.9 million presently proposed for OST programming in FY2017 and work collaboratively to design a strong, efficient and transparent system moving forward. While there are other funding sources for out-of-school time activities in the District, the funds which are allocated to the DC Trust explicitly for OST uniquely offer community-based organizations the ability to nimbly partner with multiple schools to maximize the number of kids they serve annually. As such, this funding stream directly reflects the value we as a District place on our kids’ learning in the hours after school and in the summer. In ensuring the stability and flexibility of this funding, the District will remain on track in serving children and youth with quality, community-based expanded learning opportunities.

While today's news is heartbreaking, know that we will work diligently with each and every one of you to ensure that the children, youth and families that rely on these critical services are protected. Please don't hesitate to reach out with any questions, and we'll be in touch as things unfold.

- Maggie Riden, Executive Director, on behalf of your team at DC Alliance of Youth Advocates

Tuesday, April 19, 2016

EXTRA: DCPS Budget Oversight Responses Show Promising Trends for Afterschool in FY17

We are posting this special extra blog this week to follow up on our #ExpandLearningDC report. You can also download our statement here.

At the request of the DC Council’s Committee on Education, DCPS has provided a narrative of their proposed FY2017 budgets for afterschool and extended day at individual schools ahead of the chancellor’s budget oversight hearing on Thursday, April 21, 2016.

The school district’s responses to the committee show some promising new investments in afterschool programs in DCPS Title I elementary schools and education campuses going into the next school year:
  • DCPS will bring afterschool programs back in three elementary schools in Ward 7 in FY2017. Anne Beers, Randle Highlands and Smothers elementary schools all had Office of Out of School Time (OSTP) programming in school year 2014-2015 which was discontinued in the present school year. All three schools will see this programming restored in the coming school year, with 380 new seats for afterschool student enrollment and 37 new afterschool FTE positions between the three schools. This means a total of 52 schools will offer OSTP afterschool programming in the coming school year. (This is up from 49 as reported in our policy brief.)
  • DCPS projects adding more than 800 new afterschool spaces for student enrollment in FY2017. In addition to the seats for restored programming at the three new schools, DCPS plans to add 452 new afterschool seats in existing OSTP schools. Some of the biggest gains from the current school year into next will be seen at Bruce  Monroe at Park View, Noyes, Bunker Hill, Leckie and Stanton elementary schools. The total number of OSTP afterschool slots budgeted for in the coming school year is 7,700. (This is up from 6,790 at the end of last school year, as reported in our policy brief.)
  • DCPS’s total proposed budget for afterschool programming in FY2017 is $5.4 million, a 33% increase from the current school year. Funding will cover programming at three additional schools and the new afterschool enrollment spaces, as well as 183 new FTE positions to provide afterschool coverage at the schools, for a total of 804 FTE positions system-wide.

Thursday, March 31, 2016

FY2017 Budget Asks

Today’s blog comes to you as the first installment in our team’s analysis of Mayor Bowser’s proposed DC Budget for 2017. The Mayor’s proposal is now before Council where, through upcoming budget hearings and advocacy meetings, it will be debated and revised by Council Committees before it goes to a vote in May.

In the next few weeks, we'll be providing a deeper dive into each of our budget asks. We encourage you to follow along with our budget asks and talking points, and then join us at the Wilson Building to testify about your particular concerns at DC Council budget hearings.

Transportation Support - $950,000 (Not included in the Mayor’s proposed FY17 budget)

As we highlighted last year, the cost of transportation continues to be a pervasive barrier to the success of older youth (22-24) in re-engaging and maintaining engagement in educational opportunities. Unlike their younger colleagues (ages 5-21), who have access to the Mayor’s signature Kids Ride Free program, older youth must rely on their own, often limited, incomes or the support of their LEAs and programs to cover the cost of transportation. 


Earlier this year, DCAYA conducted a survey in collaboration with Raise DC’s Disconnected Youth Change Network (DYCN), and found that 54% of respondents 22-24 reported spending over $30 a week or $120 a month travelling to and from their programs. Additionally, over half of the older youth surveyed reported spending 45% or more of their weekly income getting to and from their educational programs. 83% of these youth reported spending around one-fifth or more of their weekly income getting to and from their programs; notably 55% of youth spending this much live in Wards 5, 7, and 8. 

An additional investment of $950,000 would ensure that these youth who have overcome multiple barriers to re-engage in their education at a Local Education Agency (LEA) would be able to attend school without the persistent worry of how they will afford to get there. To include the full breadth of youth pursuing their high school diploma or equivalent through District-funded schools (LEAs) and GED programs (CBOs), a total investment of $2.2 million is necessary.

Expanded Learning - $10 million ($4.9 million allocated in the Mayor’s proposed FY17 budget)

The mayor’s proposed budget includes an allocation of $4.9 million to the DC Trust in FY2017, including afterschool and summer community-based programming. As initial allocations go, this is the strongest we’ve seen in years, and when mid-year reprogrammed funds are included, about steady with what overall out-of-school time (OST) grants over the course of fiscal years have been. While encouraging, we see this investment as a glass “half full”.

The DC Trust’s annual share of funding for OST is a direct reflection of the value we as a District place on our kids in the hours after school and in the summer, and that share has declined by more than half from 2010 to the present year, resulting in only a quarter of the locally-funded slots for afterschool and summer learning that were there for kids just six years ago:



If we are serious about providing safe, youth-friendly opportunities focused on improving outcomes and quality of life for all our children now and in future, we must reverse these trends. With a $10 million allocation to the DC Trust for OST programming in FY2017, and a commitment from leaders to the development of a dedicated funding stream, we would be back on track to serve up to four times as many children and youth with quality expanded learning opportunities.

Educational Data Capacity - Maintain the $1.1 million allocated in the Mayor’s proposed FY17 budget

We greatly appreciate that the mayor’s proposed budget includes $1.1 million to keep DC’s Statewide Longitudinal Education Data System (better known as the SLED database) stable and fully staffed. SLED has been a critical tool in transforming the District’s approach to decision-making in education. While SLED on its own is a reliable and useful data warehouse, because of partnerships like those with the college access providers, OSSE staff have already started taking SLED’s utility to the next level – namely, to reach more audiences of education data consumers to create user-friendly tools for more networks and to support the use of SLED for data-driven decision making at all levels.

In addition to the important education research underway hinging on the availability and analysis of data from SLED, it’s also important to note that SLED plays a critical role in the development of a comprehensive and coordinated workforce development system. The District’s Draft WIOA State Plan outlines plans to create a uniform system of intake, assessment, and referrals that is predicated on the maintenance of SLED. As the District moves towards a career pathways approach to workforce development, it’s critical that data on a resident’s educational and workforce experience can be shared across systems and, eventually, be made accessible to providers to streamline the eligibility and assessment processes. As other agencies look to build out on the success of the District’s education database, maintaining staffing levels and quality within the SLED team is key.   We encourage Council to hold this investment stable and ensure full operational capacity of SLED in the years to come. 

Youth Workforce Development - $870,000-$1,000,000 (Maintain FY16 expenditures for in-school youth programming; the baseline amount is still being clarified)

As Latin American Youth Center youth Ademir Delcid shared with us a few weeks back, maintaining school-based workforce development programming is a critical component of the District’s youth workforce development system. Through academic enrichment, exposing youth to work readiness skills, and offering project-based learning, in school youth programming provides workforce development to students to help keep them engaged in high school and prepare them for successful postsecondary transitions.

Under WIOA, federal expenditures for in school programs will be reduced to a maximum of 25% of the District’s total federal allocation of $2.3 million annually. At this funding mark, in school youth services would be significantly reduced. DC’s Draft WIOA State Plan includes a proposed strategy to blend the District’s reduced in school allocation with funding that flows through the Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) to make all in school youth programs accessible to youth with disabilities. While this is an important step forward for the District in serving youth with disabilities, the capacity of the District's provider community to serve this population well is currently limited, and will require investments in training and technical assistance.  DCAYA believes that current funding for in school programs should be maintained at $870,000, and additional funding should be allocated for capacity building within the District’s in school youth providers to ensure all DC youth have access to high quality and developmentally appropriate in school workforce training. 

Youth Homelessness - $800,000 (2.3 million is included in the Mayor’s proposed FY17 budget) 
(Corrected April 5, 2016. The DHS Budget book incorrectly stated the 2017 enhancement was $3.1 million.)

The mayor’s proposed budget includes $2.3 million in new funding for homeless youth services. Since the passage of the 2014 End Youth Homelessness Amendment Act, local funding for homeless youth services has remained at $1.3 million per year, which in 2014 represented just a 15% increase to homeless youth resources from the budget passed in the previous year. It was a modest increase given the mandates of the Act, but at the time, we still had incomplete data to quantify the actual need. With the start of the annual Homeless Youth Census, we now know more.

The census data makes clear that we’ll need to scale up prevention services in the year ahead, as well as add to our supply of crisis beds and transitional and independent living spaces for youth, if we are to get to the point that actual youth homelessness in the District becomes rare, brief and non-recurring by 2020. We applaud the mayor for recognizing this need and urge the council to adopt a budget that includes this important investment. There will be additional details on the DHS budget in the coming few weeks!


That's all for now! Check back next week for a closer look at our first budget ask: expanded access to transportation supports for re-engaging youth.

Wednesday, March 09, 2016

Local Funding for Local Opportunity: The Role & Vision of the DC Trust in Expanded Learning

The District of Columbia surpasses any state in its broad, unmet demand for afterschool and summer learning opportunities. More than 70% of our kids in grades K through 8 would participate in a program if one were available after school, compared to a national average of only 40% for all kids.*

The greatest gains from expanded learning programs are shown to be for youth who are considered at risk of academic failure due to poverty**, and in DC, that means close to 40,000 students in DC Public Schools (DCPS) and our public charter schools. Yet at last report for this school year, the DC Trust’s FY2016 budget had only allocated for 2,465 total out-of-school time (OST) program slots for youth. Alarmingly, the same report indicated that there is no current FY2016 budget allocation at all for summer learning.

With recent changes in the organization’s leadership and internal staffing structures, there has been lingering uncertainty about the DC Trust’s future as the grantmaking intermediary for local OST funding - uncertainty we strove to resolve at their recent performance hearing on February 23, 2016.

Community Providers Weigh In
The DC Alliance of Youth Advocates (DCAYA) and several of our community-based partners testified at the performance oversight hearing for the DC Trust before the DC Council’s Committee on Health and Human Services. Several clear themes emerged from across partner testimonies:

Wednesday, October 21, 2015

Keeping the Lights On After School in DC

As part of Afterschool Awareness month, DCAYA will be featuring the work of our community-based partners throughout the month of October. This week, in concert with the Afterschool Alliance’s Lights On Afterschool, we take a look at the need and present funding for afterschool programs in DC.

October is Afterschool Awareness Month, and on and around October 22, events will be held nationally for Lights On Afterschool to underscore the need for investment in afterschool programs. In DC, this need is especially heightened. More and more District families are seeking after school enrichment opportunities for their kids while at the same time, fewer public dollars are being invested in proven programs.

“These programs inspire children to learn beyond an instructional classroom setting,” says Jodi Grant, executive director of the national Afterschool Alliance. “By providing one-on-one mentoring and homework help, healthy snacks and team sports, new STEM learning opportunities such as robotics and computer programming, expanded time to learn art and music in a studio setting, and countless other hands-on opportunities, afterschool programs build upon classroom learning to promote positive youth development and motivate each child and youth toward college and job readiness.”

The Afterschool Alliance has promoted a growing body of research that shows afterschool programs and expanded learning programs keep kids safe, help working families, and encourage increased parental involvement in children’s learning. Data gathered by the Alliance have shown that for every child in an afterschool program nationally, there are two more whose parents say they would participate if a program were available. So, how does DC stack up?

DC Afterschool Investment Falls Short of Demand

The Afterschool Alliance’s survey data show that in DC, the unmet demand is greater than in any state: An estimated 72% of children in the District in grades 6 through 8 would participate in an afterschool program if one were available to them (compared to 40% nationally).

Community-based providers of afterschool programming in the District have a proven track record for tangible outcomes. Yet there is presently little political will toward expanding access in order to match the level of demand in the community. In fact, as other states and localities increasingly see funding for afterschool as a major policy goal, funding for expanded learning and enrichment programming (afterschool and during the summer) in the District (and youth development programs in general) has actually followed a downward trend in recent years.

Less funding means fewer spots in afterschool programs for the kids who need them most. Just last month, due to funding constraints, the DC Trust cut $460,000 from their out of school time grants and 24 organizations saw their funding discontinued. As a result of these cuts, as many as 1,200 expanded learning slots were lost.

In the wake of these cuts, a $1.2 million allocation to the DC Trust has been proposed to fund a series of “mini-grants” to five target neighborhoods. While the grants are well-intentioned to target funding toward neighborhoods most at-risk, the structure of the grant distribution has youth afterschool enrichment and mentoring programs competing with violence prevention and family support programs for the same pot of funding, and in a limited geographic area. Further, with each grant capped at $25,000, we remain concerned that the scope of the funding is insufficient to significantly affect outcomes.

In order to keep the lights on after school in DC, the District needs to return to having stable, multi-year funding to quality organizations. Only with the assurance of a stable funding stream will the District’s strong network of community-based providers be able to better collaborate with more schools and expand the reach of afterschool expanded learning and enrichment opportunities to the kids and families who have the greatest need.

DCAYA thanks the Afterschool Alliance for contributing to this post and for their work toward raising awareness on the need for afterschool investment. For more information on DCAYA's Expanded Learning work, please contact Joseph Gavrilovich.

Wednesday, April 29, 2015

Face the Truth: DC Trust Budget Reduction will Hurt 2,391 Students

In past blogs, DCAYA has talked a lot about the DCPS afterschool budget cut and the effect it will have on the afterschool infrastructure by laying off 25 DCPS-OSTP coordinators.

Read more about the DCPS budget cut: Budget Cuts to DC Afterschool Programs

Sadly, the damage to afterschool programming doesn’t stop there. The DC Trust did not receive $2.5 million for their afterschool grants in the proposed FY16 budget. These afterschool grants support 78 youth-serving organizations across the District. Programs like DC SCORES, Higher Achievement, and Words, Beats, & Life, Inc., are just a few DC Trust grantees who will lose funding if the $2.5 million is not restored.

The impact these organizations’ have on a students’ development goes beyond just words. View the faces of the children and youth who may lose their favorite afterschool programs if funding is not restored and sustained for future budget cycles.

Wednesday, April 08, 2015

Budget Cuts to DC Afterschool Programs

It’s that time of year again: The DCAYA team brings you our analysis of the newly released DC budget.

This year, we’re going to split our analysis into two sections. Part 1, today’s blog, will focus on cuts in the DCPS afterschool budget. Next week, Part 2 ,will focus on our concerns related to older youth services and system level investments.

**To preface, this analysis is in its working stages. We are actively tracking down greater details about the budget. Nonetheless, we have identified some clear areas of concern that we did not want to delay in getting out to parents, service providers, and other community partners. I strongly encourage you to continue to visit our blog, Twitter, Facebook and website for updates as the budget analysis process continues.

Concern regarding Afterschool Funding:

Overview:

Just last year, DC ranked #2 in the country for having the best afterschool programs. Over 7,200 students were enrolled in afterschool programs and  DCPS stated its commitment to universal access to afterschool programming. Why? Afterschool programs, or expanded learning opportunities, have been shown to improve academic, social/emotional , health and safety aspects of students’ lives. Working parents, particularly for those with younger children and limited income, need afterschool programs for economic stability and the safety of their children.

Yet, after examining the budget documents for the upcoming year, which were released April 2, we know with certainty that broad, deep funding cuts will result in thousands of students not being able to attend afterschool programs next year, unless Council makes immediate changes to the budget.